SMILES:
CC1=CC=C(C=C1)OC(=O)C
Aroma Description:
narcissus, phenolic, animal1
| Receptor | Expression | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR1A1 | 73 | -3.4 3 | 9 3 | sweet, citrus, fresh, rose, herbal, waxy, orange, spearmint, floral, aldehydic | |
| OR9Q2 | 100 | -4.82 2 | - | narcissus, animal, mimosa | |
| OR2W1 | 53 | - | 2.2 3 | sweet, tart, hay, fatty, coumarinic, orange, peony, cinnamon, herbal, tonka | |
| OR5P3 | 100 | - | 0.8 3 | mimosa, hawthorn, spearmint, coumarinic, hay, sweet, acacia, orangeflower, powdery, naphthyl |
SMILES:
CC1=CC=C(C=C1)OC(=O)C
Aroma Description:
narcissus, phenolic, animal
| Receptor | Expr.% | Agonist? | Dock Score | Known agonist | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
Dock Score is a measure of how strongly the algorithm thinks the odorant is likely to be an agonist of the receptor.
Receptors in italics are "orphans", i.e. receptors whose agonists have not been identified experimentally.
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Keiichi Yoshikawa, Naoko Saito (2016) Method for selecting odor-controlling substance EP3305898B1
3.) Shirai, T., Takase, D., Yokoyama, J. et al. Functions of human olfactory mucus and age-dependent changes. Sci Rep 13, 971 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27937-1