SMILES:
C=CCOC(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1
Aroma Description:
honey, fruity, rummy1
| Receptor | Expression | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR2W1 | 53 | -3.55 3, -4.81 4, -5.19 5, -8.3 6 | 5.3333 3, 9.8 4, (agonist) 5, (agonist) 6 | sweet, tart, hay, fatty, coumarinic, orange, peony, cinnamon, herbal, tonka | |
| OR51L1 | 88 | -7.92 2, -2.55 3, -4.17 4, -6.04 6 | 4.9945 2, 1.4 3, 9 4, (agonist) 6 | sour, cheesy, honey, sweaty, civet | |
| OR1A1 | 73 | -5.12 4 | 4.3333 3, 9.7 4 | sweet, citrus, fresh, rose, herbal, waxy, orange, spearmint, floral, aldehydic | |
| OR10G7 | 80 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR10J5 | 84 | - | 0 3, 0 4 | ||
| OR1C1 | 100 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2A25 | 100 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2B11 | 100 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2J2 | 92 | - | 0 3, 0 4 | ||
| OR2J3 | 100 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2W3 | 100 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR51E1 | 100 | - | 0 3, 0 4 | ||
| OR56A4 | 100 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR5K1 | 100 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR8D1 | 96 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR8K3 | 92 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2C1 | 100 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR10G3 | 96 | - | -0.0167 3 | ||
| OR11A1 | 100 | - | -0.6667 3 | ||
| OR5P3 | 100 | - | -2.6667 3, 0 4 |
SMILES:
C=CCOC(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1
Aroma Description:
honey, fruity, rummy
| Receptor | Expr.% | Agonist? | Dock Score | Known agonist | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
Dock Score is a measure of how strongly the algorithm thinks the odorant is likely to be an agonist of the receptor.
Receptors in italics are "orphans", i.e. receptors whose agonists have not been identified experimentally.
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Mainland JD, Li YR, Zhou T, Liu WL, Matsunami H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci Data. 2015 Feb 3;2:150002. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.2. PMID: 25977809; PMCID: PMC4412152.
3.) Adipietro KA, Mainland JD, Matsunami H (2012) Functional Evolution of Mammalian Odorant Receptors. PLoS Genet 8(7): e1002821. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002821
4.) Saito H, Chi Q, Zhuang H, Matsunami H, Mainland JD. Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire. Sci Signal. 2009 Mar 3;2(60):ra9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000016. PMID: 19261596; PMCID: PMC2774247.
5.) Haag, Franziska et al. “Copper-mediated thiol potentiation and mutagenesis-guided modeling suggest a highly conserved copper-binding motif in human OR2M3.” Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS vol. 77,11 (2020): 2157-2179. doi:10.1007/s00018-019-03279-y
6.) Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s chemical signatures in human olfaction: A foodborne perspective for future biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 7124–7143.