SMILES:
CC1[C@@H]2[C@H]3[C@H]([C@@]1(CCCC3(C)C)C)CC2=O
Aroma Description:
dry, woody, patchouli, cedar, earthy, tobacco, incense1
SMILES:
CC1[C@@H]2[C@H]3[C@H]([C@@]1(CCCC3(C)C)C)CC2=O
Aroma Description:
dry, woody, patchouli, cedar, earthy, tobacco, incense
| Receptor | Expr.% | Agonist? | Dock Score | Known agonist | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
Dock Score is a measure of how strongly the algorithm thinks the odorant is likely to be an agonist of the receptor.
Receptors in italics are "orphans", i.e. receptors whose agonists have not been identified experimentally.
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Keiichi Yoshikawa, Jun Deguchi, Hu Jieying et al. Diverse yet selective tuning of an odorant receptor for sensing four classes of musk compounds, 03 August 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1916850/v1]
3.) Keiichi Yoshikawa, Naoko Saito, Aya Namba, Ichiro Mori (2017) Urine odor suppressor WO2017090518A1
4.) Roger Emter, Christel Merillat, Fiona Buchli, Felix Flachsmann, Andreas Natsch. Decoding human olfaction by high heterologous expression of odorant receptors detecting signature odorants. Current Biology, October 10, 2025