SMILES:
CCCCCCC=O

Aroma Description:
aldehydic, cognac, fatty, fresh, green, herbal, ozone1

Receptor Expression log10 EC50 Adj. Top Antagonist? Correlated Perceptual Qualities
OR1A2 19 -6.77 5, -6.77 6, -6.77 10 -  citrus, waxy, aldehydic, orange, fresh, orange_peel, tart, rose, sweet, floral
OR1A1 73 -6.49 5, -6.49 6, -6.49 10 -  sweet, citrus, fresh, rose, herbal, waxy, orange, spearmint, floral, aldehydic
OR1J2 100 - 10 11  ozone, cognac, aldehydic, fatty, fresh, peel
VN1R4 ? - 8 7  peely, orange_peel, peel, aldehydic, orris, fatty
OR2W1 53 -4.06 4 7.8 4  sweet, tart, hay, fatty, coumarinic, orange, peony, cinnamon, herbal, tonka
VN1R3 ? - 7 7  orange_peel, peely, aldehydic
OR1D2 100 -2.71 9 -  rose, citrus, fresh, sweet, floral, waxy, fatty, bois_de_rose, peach, blueberry
OR1G1 61 - 3.0457 2, 0 11  sweet, waxy, citrus, fresh, tart, orange, aldehydic, floral, rose, fatty
OR52D1 100 - 1.1168 2, 0 11  dairy, cheesy, anise, milky, creamy, sour, sharp, peach, lactonic, rancid
VN1R1 ? - 0.3 7, 0.125 8  lemon, lactonic, natural, grapefruit, sweet, jasmine, spearmint, tropical, oily, sharp
OR7D4 96 - 0.2 3  animal, citrus, orange, peely, tart, aldehydic, blueberry
OR10J5 84 - 0 4   
OR2C1 100 - 0 4   
OR2J2 92 - 0 4   
OR51E1 100 - 0 4   
OR51L1 88 - 0 4   
OR5P3 100 - 0 4   
OR10C1 61 - 0 11   
OR10G7 80 - 0 11   
OR10H1 100 - 0 11   
OR10H4 61 - 0 11   
OR11G2 80 - 0 11   
OR13C2 100 - 0 11   
OR1E2 80 - 0 11   
OR2B2 ? - 0 11   
OR2H2 88 - 0 11   
OR2T4 80 - 0 11   
OR3A1 92 - 0 11   
OR4D9 100 - 0 11   
OR4K14 80 - 0 11   
OR4P4 57 - 0 11   
OR4S1 42 - 0 11   
OR4X1 23 - 0 11   
OR51T1 76 - 0 11   
OR56B4 96 - 0 11   
OR5I1 46 - 0 11   
OR6S1 46 - 0 11   
OR4D11 34 - 0 12   
 

SMILES:
CCCCCCC=O

Aroma Description:
aldehydic, cognac, fatty, fresh, green, herbal, ozone

Receptor Expr.% Agonist? Dock Score Known agonist Correlated Perceptual Qualities

Dock Score is a measure of how strongly the algorithm thinks the odorant is likely to be an agonist of the receptor.
Receptors in italics are "orphans", i.e. receptors whose agonists have not been identified experimentally.

1.) The Good Scents Company

2.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002

3.) Keller A, Zhuang H, Chi Q, Vosshall LB, Matsunami H. Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):468-72. doi: 10.1038/nature06162. Epub 2007 Sep 16. PMID: 17873857.

4.) Saito H, Chi Q, Zhuang H, Matsunami H, Mainland JD. Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire. Sci Signal. 2009 Mar 3;2(60):ra9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000016. PMID: 19261596; PMCID: PMC2774247.

5.) Silva Teixeira CS, Silva Ferreira AC, Cerqueira NM. Studying Haloanisoles Interaction with Olfactory Receptors. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2016 Jul 20;7(7):870-85. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00335. Epub 2016 May 9. PMID: 27092849.

6.) Schmiedeberg K, Shirokova E, Weber HP, Schilling B, Meyerhof W, Krautwurst D. Structural determinants of odorant recognition by the human olfactory receptors OR1A1 and OR1A2. J Struct Biol. 2007 Sep;159(3):400-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 May 25. PMID: 17601748.

7.) Krautwurst D. Human olfactory receptor families and their odorants. Chem Biodivers. 2008 Jun;5(6):842-52. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200890099. PMID: 18618407.

8.) I. Wallrabenstein, J. Gerber, S. Rasche, I. Croy, S. Kurtenbach, T. Hummel, H. Hatt, The smelling of Hedione results in sex-differentiated human brain activity, NeuroImage, Volume 113, 2015, Pages 365-373, ISSN 1053-8119

9.) Veithen, A.; Wilin, F.; Philippeau, M.; Chatelain, P. OR1D2 is a broadly tuned human olfactory receptor. Chem. Senses 2015, 40, 262–263.

10.) Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s chemical signatures in human olfaction: A foodborne perspective for future biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 7124–7143.

11.) Lim J. H., J. Park, E. H. Oh, H. J. Ko, S. Hong, and Park, T. H. (2014) Nanovesicle-based bioelectronic nose for the diagnosis of lung cancer from human blood. Adv. Healthcare Mater., 3: 360–366.

12.) Cho, S.W., Ko, H.J. & Park, T.H. Identification of a Lung Cancer Biomarker Using a Cancer Cell Line and Screening of Olfactory Receptors for Biomarker Detection. Biotechnol Bioproc E 26, 55–62 (2021).

×
 
 

Code version:
 

Docker used:
 

Files:
Active model: text 3D download
Inactive model: text 3D download
Active dock: text 3D download
Inactive dock: text 3D download
JSON entry: text   download