SMILES:
O=C(C1=C(CCCC1(C)C)C)\C=C\C
Aroma Description:
berry, currant, floral, fruity, honey, plum, rose, tobacco1
| Receptor | Expression | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR8K3 | 92 | -5.97 7 | 2.3333 2 | natural, sugar, mentholic, plum, petal, tobacco | |
| OR4C3 | 34 | - | 1.9231 5 | currant, plum, rose, honey, berry | |
| OR5L1 | 53 | - | 1.9231 5 | currant, sweet, plum, musk, berry, tobacco, powdery, ambrette, honey, floral | |
| OR10G3 | 96 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR10J5 | 84 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR11A1 | 100 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR1C1 | 100 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR2A25 | 100 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR2B11 | 100 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR2J2 | 92 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR2J3 | 100 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR2W1 | 53 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR51E1 | 100 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR51L1 | 88 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR56A4 | 100 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR8D1 | 96 | - | 0 2 | ||
| OR5A1 | 100 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR5A2 | 100 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR5AN1 | 100 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2T11 | 96 | - | 0 4 | Y | |
| OR5I1 | 46 | - | 0 5 | ||
| OR10G7 | 80 | - | -0.0667 2 | ||
| OR5K1 | 100 | - | 0.2267 2, -0.4 6 | hazelnut, nutty, peanut, roasted, carnation, cocoa, almond | |
| OR1A1 | 73 | - | -1.3333 2 | ||
| OR5P3 | 100 | - | -2.6667 2 |
SMILES:
O=C(C1=C(CCCC1(C)C)C)\C=C\C
Aroma Description:
berry, currant, floral, fruity, honey, plum, rose, tobacco
| Receptor | Expr.% | Agonist? | Dock Score | Known agonist | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
Dock Score is a measure of how strongly the algorithm thinks the odorant is likely to be an agonist of the receptor.
Receptors in italics are "orphans", i.e. receptors whose agonists have not been identified experimentally.
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Adipietro KA, Mainland JD, Matsunami H (2012) Functional Evolution of Mammalian Odorant Receptors. PLoS Genet 8(7): e1002821. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002821
3.) Keiichi Yoshikawa, Jun Deguchi, Hu Jieying et al. Diverse yet selective tuning of an odorant receptor for sensing four classes of musk compounds, 03 August 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1916850/v1]
4.) Antagonistic interactions between odorants alter human odor perception Yosuke Fukutani, Masashi Abe, Haruka Saito, Ryo Eguchi, Toshiaki Tazawa, Claire A. de March, Masafumi Yohda, Hiroaki Matsunami bioRxiv 2022.08.02.502184; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.02.502184
5.) Ashti Baghaei, K. (2015). Large scale analysis of olfactory receptors with highly genetically variations in relation with specific anosmia (Doctoral dissertation, Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Diss., 2013).
6.) Aya Kato, Naoko Saito, Michiaki Inoue, Kayoko Nomizu (2015) Method of identifying an agent for inhibiting odor of pyrazine derivatives US9057090B2
7.) Roger Emter, Christel Merillat, Fiona Buchli, Felix Flachsmann, Andreas Natsch. Decoding human olfaction by high heterologous expression of odorant receptors detecting signature odorants. Current Biology, October 10, 2025