SMILES:
CCOC1=C(C=CC(=C1)C=O)O
Aroma Description:
sweet, creamy, vanilla, caramellic1
| Receptor | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR10G3 | -2.1 4, -5.01 8 | 0.6667 4 | vanilla, chocolate, carnation, malty, clove | |
| OR10G4 | -4.9 6 | 9.5 6 | vanilla, carnation, smoky | |
| OR2J2 | -4 2 | 2.3487 2, 3.3333 4 | tart, carnation, orange, hay, clove, sweet, warm, cinnamon | |
| OR2W3 | - | 7.907 7 | lemon, citrus | |
| OR1G1 | - | 3.2995 3 | waxy, tart, orange, sweet, aldehydic, medicinal, citrus, clean, fresh, anise | |
| OR3A1 | -2.73 2 | 0.2887 2 | cork_taint | |
| OR6C65 | -2.68 2 | 0.3535 2 | (insufficient data) | |
| OR8B8 | -2.63 2 | 0.2792 2 | cilantro | |
| OR52D1 | - | 0.7614 3 | anise, cheesy, rancid, orange, dairy, sour, sweet, tart, sharp, pineapple | |
| OR10H2 | - | 0.3944 2 | candy, warm, lavender, cinnamon, rummy | |
| OR10G7 | - | 0.2333 4 | clove, carnation, smoky | |
| OR7D4 | - | 0.2 5 | animal | |
| OR10J5 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR11A1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR1C1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR2A25 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR2J3 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR2W1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR51E1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR51L1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR56A4 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR5K1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR8K3 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR8D1 | - | -0.0167 4 | ||
| OR2B11 | - | -0.5 4 | ||
| OR1A1 | - | -1.5667 4 | ||
| OR5P3 | - | -1.6333 4 |
SMILES:
CCOC1=C(C=CC(=C1)C=O)O
Aroma Description:
sweet, creamy, vanilla, caramellic
| Receptor | Docking Score | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Mainland JD, Li YR, Zhou T, Liu WL, Matsunami H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci Data. 2015 Feb 3;2:150002. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.2. PMID: 25977809; PMCID: PMC4412152.
3.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
4.) Adipietro KA, Mainland JD, Matsunami H (2012) Functional Evolution of Mammalian Odorant Receptors. PLoS Genet 8(7): e1002821. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002821
5.) Keller A, Zhuang H, Chi Q, Vosshall LB, Matsunami H. Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):468-72. doi: 10.1038/nature06162. Epub 2007 Sep 16. PMID: 17873857.
6.) J.D. Mainland, A. Keller, Y.R. Li, T. Zhou, C. Trimmer, L.L. Snyder, A.H. Moberly, K.A. Adipietro, W.L.L. Liu, H. Zhuang et al, The missense of smell: functional variability in the human odorant receptor repertoire, Nat. Neurosci. 17 (2014) 114-120
7.) Huang, J., Lam, H., Koziol-White, C., Limjunyawong, N., Kim, D., Kim, N., ... & An, S. S. (2020). The odorant receptor OR2W3 on airway smooth muscle evokes bronchodilation via a cooperative chemosensory tradeoff between TMEM16A and CFTR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(45), 28485-28495.
8.) Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s chemical signatures in human olfaction: A foodborne perspective for future biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 7124–7143.