SMILES:
CCCCCCCCCO
Aroma Description:
aldehydic, citrus, clean, dusty, fatty, floral, fresh, oily, orange, rose, sweet, tart, waxy, wet1
| Receptor | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR2W1 | -4.63 4, -5.05 7 | - | sweet, herbal, tart, fatty, orange, passionfruit, fresh, mimosa, rancid, mushroom | |
| OR1G1 | - | 9.8985 2, 7.0588 5 | waxy, tart, orange, sweet, aldehydic, medicinal, citrus, clean, fresh, anise | |
| VN1R2 | - | 9 6 | tart, orange, dusty | |
| OR1D2 | -4.26 8 | - | rose, peach, bois_de_rose, citrus, floral, fresh, lactonic, coconut, lime, waxy | |
| OR2J2 | -4.16 4 | 8.4 4 | tart, carnation, orange, hay, clove, sweet, warm, cinnamon | |
| VN1R5 | - | 7 6 | tart, orange_peel, aldehydic, spearmint, caraway, waxy, citrus, blueberry, rose, orange | |
| OR52D1 | - | 4.5685 2 | anise, cheesy, rancid, orange, dairy, sour, sweet, tart, sharp, pineapple | |
| OR10G3 | - | 0.01 3 | vanilla, chocolate, carnation, malty, clove | |
| OR10G7 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR1A1 | - | 0 3, 0 4, 0 7 | ||
| OR2A25 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2B11 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR2J3 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR51E1 | - | 0 3, 0 4 | ||
| OR56A4 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR5K1 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR8D1 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR8K3 | - | 0 3 | ||
| OR10J5 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR2C1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR51L1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR5P3 | - | 0 4 |
SMILES:
CCCCCCCCCO
Aroma Description:
aldehydic, citrus, clean, dusty, fatty, floral, fresh, oily, orange, rose, sweet, tart, waxy, wet
| Receptor | Docking Score | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
3.) Adipietro KA, Mainland JD, Matsunami H (2012) Functional Evolution of Mammalian Odorant Receptors. PLoS Genet 8(7): e1002821. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002821
4.) Saito H, Chi Q, Zhuang H, Matsunami H, Mainland JD. Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire. Sci Signal. 2009 Mar 3;2(60):ra9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000016. PMID: 19261596; PMCID: PMC2774247.
5.) L. Charlier, J. Topin, C. Ronin, S.K. Kim, W.A. Goddard, 3rd, R. Efremov, J. Golebiowski, How broadly tuned olfactory receptors equally recognize their agonists. Human OR1G1 as a test case, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69 (2012) 4205-4213.
6.) Krautwurst D. Human olfactory receptor families and their odorants. Chem Biodivers. 2008 Jun;5(6):842-52. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200890099. PMID: 18618407.
7.) Christiane Geithe, Franziska Noe, Johanna Kreissl, Dietmar Krautwurst, The Broadly Tuned Odorant Receptor OR1A1 is Highly Selective for 3-Methyl-2,4-nonanedione, a Key Food Odorant in Aged Wines, Tea, and Other Foods, Chemical Senses, Volume 42, Issue 3, 1 March 2017, Pages 181–193, https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjw117
8.) Veithen, A.; Wilin, F.; Philippeau, M.; Chatelain, P. OR1D2 is a broadly tuned human olfactory receptor. Chem. Senses 2015, 40, 262–263.