SMILES:
CC(=CCC/C(=C/COC(=O)C)/C)C
Aroma Description:
floral, rose, lavender, green, waxy, herbal, cooling, oily, soapy, citrus, winey, rummy1
| Receptor | log10 EC50 | Adj. Top | Antagonist? | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR2A25 | -8.06 2, -2.57 4, -6.09 7 | 2.2637 2, 1.4333 4 | lavender, rummy, cooling, winey, medicinal, soapy | |
| OR2J3 | -3 2, -4.71 7 | - | passionfruit, candy, currant, warm, cinnamon, tart, juicy, hay, foliage | |
| OR1D2 | -4 2, -2.91 6 | 0.9405 2 | rose, peach, bois_de_rose, citrus, floral, fresh, lactonic, coconut, lime, waxy | |
| OR10H2 | -3 2 | - | candy, warm, lavender, cinnamon, rummy | |
| OR2F1 | -3.59 2 | 0.9378 2 | acetone, carnation, malty | |
| OR2M2 | -0.57 2 | 1.5506 2 | leathery, terpenic, rose | |
| OR52D1 | - | 1.269 3 | anise, cheesy, rancid, orange, dairy, sour, sweet, tart, sharp, pineapple | |
| OR1G1 | - | 0.7107 3 | waxy, tart, orange, sweet, aldehydic, medicinal, citrus, clean, fresh, anise | |
| OR7D4 | - | 0.4 5 | animal | |
| OR10G3 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR10G7 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR10J5 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR11A1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR2B11 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR2J2 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR2W1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR51E1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR51L1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR56A4 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR5K1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR8D1 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR8K3 | - | 0 4 | ||
| OR1A1 | - | -1.1667 4 | ||
| OR5P3 | - | -2.6333 4 |
SMILES:
CC(=CCC/C(=C/COC(=O)C)/C)C
Aroma Description:
floral, rose, lavender, green, waxy, herbal, cooling, oily, soapy, citrus, winey, rummy
| Receptor | Docking Score | Correlated Perceptual Qualities |
|---|
1.) The Good Scents Company
2.) Mainland JD, Li YR, Zhou T, Liu WL, Matsunami H. Human olfactory receptor responses to odorants. Sci Data. 2015 Feb 3;2:150002. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.2. PMID: 25977809; PMCID: PMC4412152.
3.) Guenhael Sanz, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet and Loic Briand Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism Chemical Senses vol. 30 no. 1 (2005) doi:10.1093/chemse/bji002
4.) Adipietro KA, Mainland JD, Matsunami H (2012) Functional Evolution of Mammalian Odorant Receptors. PLoS Genet 8(7): e1002821. doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002821
5.) Keller A, Zhuang H, Chi Q, Vosshall LB, Matsunami H. Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):468-72. doi: 10.1038/nature06162. Epub 2007 Sep 16. PMID: 17873857.
6.) Veithen, A.; Wilin, F.; Philippeau, M.; Chatelain, P. OR1D2 is a broadly tuned human olfactory receptor. Chem. Senses 2015, 40, 262–263.
7.) Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s chemical signatures in human olfaction: A foodborne perspective for future biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 7124–7143.